Italy’s largest payments player saying no to private equity is more than a deal decision. It signals a strategic shift in how European fintech platforms view scale, sovereignty, and long-term infrastructure value.
Subscribe now for best practices, research reports, and more.
When Nexi publicly rejected a takeover offer from private equity firm TPG for its digital banking assets, the decision immediately sparked debate across Europe’s fintech and payments ecosystem.
In a market where consolidation has become the default response to margin pressure and rising costs, Nexi’s refusal stood out. This was not a valuation disagreement alone. It was a declaration of intent: a belief that long-term platform value outweighs short-term capital exits.
To understand why this decision matters and why it’s generating such high engagement we need to look at where European payments are headed next.
Over the past decade, Europe’s payments ecosystem has grown rapidly but unevenly. Fragmented national markets, multiple payment schemes, and varying regulatory frameworks created opportunities for specialised providers to scale quickly.
That phase is ending.
Today, European payment providers face:
According to McKinsey, as payments markets mature, value increasingly shifts toward platforms that can operate at scale while managing complexity across geographies and rails. This is the context in which Nexi’s decision should be read.
Private equity interest in payments is not new. Payments offer predictable volumes, recurring revenue, and infrastructure-like characteristics all attractive traits for financial investors.
So why reject the offer? For Nexi, the answer appears to lie in control and trajectory.
Accepting a PE acquisition often implies:
By remaining independent, Nexi preserves the ability to:
This is particularly relevant in Europe, where payments infrastructure is increasingly viewed through the lens of economic and digital sovereignty.
Payments providers today are caught between two forces:
Nexi’s rejection highlights an important nuance. Scale does not have to come through acquisition alone. It can also be built through:
BCG notes that infrastructure-led payments platforms that control their long-term roadmap tend to outperform those optimised purely for near-term financial exits.
Nexi’s move is likely to have ripple effects across Europe.
Other payments providers will face similar questions:
We are likely to see a bifurcation in the market:
Both paths are viable but they lead to very different outcomes.
For banks, Nexi’s decision reinforces an important trend. Payments providers are no longer just vendors. Many are becoming platform peers with comparable scale, technology depth, and client reach. Banks that rely heavily on external PSPs without clear orchestration strategies risk losing leverage over time. Conversely, banks that modernise their own payments infrastructure and partner selectively will be better positioned to navigate this shift.
At FT, we see Nexi’s rejection of the TPG offer as a signal that payments infrastructure is entering a strategic phase, not just a financial one. As payments become more embedded, regulated, and critical to economic flows, decisions around ownership, architecture, and control matter more than ever.
The winners in this phase will be organisations that:
Independence, when paired with the right architecture, can be a competitive advantage.
Whether through consolidation or independence, payments providers face the same underlying challenge: managing complexity at scale. That requires:
At FT, we help banks and payments platforms design infrastructure that supports growth, regardless of ownership structure.
Book a strategy call to explore how your payments architecture can remain resilient and competitive in Europe’s evolving fintech landscape.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
